W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Next few weeks in RIF

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:23:36 +0000
Message-ID: <4B953298.4040304@gmail.com>
To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Done but it makes for a really big document (about 5x previous version). 
  I wonder if it would be better to put them at a known web location and 
reference that from the document.

Sandro, what's the right process here?

Cheers,
Dave

On 05/03/2010 14:35, Chris Welty wrote:
>
> Great, thanks Dave. Can you add the XML for the rules to an appendix?
>
> -Chris
>
> Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> On 01/03/2010 19:51, Chris Welty wrote:
>>>
>>> RIFWG,
>>>
>>> We'd like to make a push for the next few weeks to get ready for
>>> transition. We have some decisions to make, some work to do on the
>>> documents, etc.
>>> So, we will resume weekly telecons for about a month, starting tomorrow.
>>>
>>> What is the status of the "other" documents, should we change or update
>>> them? Are they in their final form?
>>>
>>> UCR: Leora?
>>> XML-data: Christian?
>>> OWL2/RL: Dave?
>>
>> As far as I know that is up to date. There have been several small
>> changes since the first working draft. Rule errors spotted by Axel,
>> some missing rules (due to changes in OWL 2 RL I had missed) and
>> updated to use the List builtins. I have just updated the translation
>> appendix (7) following Axel's recent comment that his fix hadn't been
>> replicated there.
>>
>> However, there is one remaining Editor note (duplicated in two places):
>>
>> "These rules are believed to be correct. However, since the original
>> version was developed various manual edits have been made to conform
>> to changes in RIF and OWL 2 RL. Mechanical verification will be
>> required before final publication."
>>
>> I'm not sure what to do about this. I'm no longer in a position to be
>> running tests and verification on the updated rules. We could publish
>> without this note and fix any further errors that implementers spot
>> via Errata.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 17:24:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 March 2010 17:24:37 GMT