FYI: my comment to OWL WG about DTs in OWL 2 RL

As I mentioned some time ago, it seems to me that the set of datatypes
in OWL 2 RL was chosen based on incorrect assumption.  I sent an e-mail
about this to the OWL comments list [1].
Just FYI.

Best, Jos

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0022.html
-- 
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of
his own mistakes deserves to be called a
scholar.
  - Donald Foster