W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Exit Criteria

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:38:46 +0200
Message-ID: <4A9BC456.2090902@inf.unibz.it>
To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Looks okay to me.
The implementation requirements for BLD and PRD are a bit vague, but I
don't mind.

Best, Jos

Chris Welty wrote:
> 
> I edited Sandro's proposal, in particular I lowered the bar on DTB a
> little by not required two complete DTB implementations, just two
> implementations of each datatype & builtin (DTB is v. large and there
> isn't a lot of time).
> 
> I removed the OWL-DL requirement for SWC, making it at least one RDF and
> at least one OWL.
> 
> I removed the requirement that proposed FLD dialects be implemented.
> 
> Comments?  We need to vote on this Tuesday.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>>   PROPOSED: approve exit criteria
>>
>> Sorry, I was supposed to draft something for this a while ago.  Here's
>> what I've got.   I haven't had a chance to run it by the chairs.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Exit_Criteria
>>
>>     -- Sandro
>>
> 

-- 
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/



Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 12:39:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 August 2009 12:39:08 GMT