W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:24:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4875E354.6020003@inf.unibz.it>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> I still realized two editorial issues around DTB:
> 1. We adopt the xdt datatyes yearMonthDuration and dataTimeDuration
> where I just realized, that we use the xdt: namespace here, which is:
> http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xpath-datatypes whereas in DTB, I accidently 
> wrote xs:yearMonthDuration, xs:dayTimeDuration.

xs is *correct*. See:

xdt was in an earlier draft, I believe

> - We should add the xdt namespace in Section 1 of DTB, and
> - I would change xs:yearMonthDuration, xs:dayTimeDuration to
>   xdt:yearMonthDuration, xdt:dayTimeDuration, respectively
>   throughout the document.
> 2. In DTB we use consistently "data type" instead of "datatype", In BLD, 
> and FLD both occur, SWC uses consistently "datatype"... What shall we use?

The latter, because the former does not make sense and the latter is 
consistently used in (I think all) specs relevant to us

Best, Jos

> Unless I hear objections by tomorrow, I would change 1.
> even if the document is frozen, ok?
> And I would strongly suggest we resolve 2. before LC for BLD and SWC
> Axel


Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
   -- George Bernard Shaw

Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 10:25:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:51 UTC