W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:00:53 +0100
Message-ID: <4875EBE5.9070204@deri.org>
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>> I still realized two editorial issues around DTB:
>>
>> 1. We adopt the xdt datatyes yearMonthDuration and dataTimeDuration
>> where I just realized, that we use the xdt: namespace here, which is:
>> http://www.w3.org/2004/10/xpath-datatypes whereas in DTB, I accidently 
>> wrote xs:yearMonthDuration, xs:dayTimeDuration.
> 
> xs is *correct*. See:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-xpath-functions-20070123/#dt-yearMonthDuration 
>  
> xdt was in an earlier draft, I believe

ah, fine, dunno how I stumbled over that, sorry for the confusion then, 
everything fine then! I see now: google tricked me... when i looked for
yearMonthDuration I accidently got to an old WD as the first link, weird.

>> - We should add the xdt namespace in Section 1 of DTB, and
>> - I would change xs:yearMonthDuration, xs:dayTimeDuration to
>>   xdt:yearMonthDuration, xdt:dayTimeDuration, respectively
>>   throughout the document.

void then.

>> 2. In DTB we use consistently "data type" instead of "datatype", In 
>> BLD, and FLD both occur, SWC uses consistently "datatype"... What 
>> shall we use?
> 
> The latter, because the former does not make sense and the latter is 
> consistently used in (I think all) specs relevant to us

It was basically, I guess, because the document started with onyl the 
title "Data Types and Builtins" ... I am anyway fine to change it to 
Datatypes consistently, without wanting to discuss whether one or the 
other makes "more sense", I just want it consistent. ;-)

best,
Axel

> Best, Jos
> 
>>
>>
>> Unless I hear objections by tomorrow, I would change 1.
>> even if the document is frozen, ok?
>>
>> And I would strongly suggest we resolve 2. before LC for BLD and SWC
>>
>> Axel
>>
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Everything is possible:
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource.
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf.
rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf.
rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 11:01:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:50 GMT