Re: W3C mock's users [via Restricted Media Community Group]

Sorry David, I was replying directly to your email instead of the list.
I'll paste my reply.

---------------------------------------
OK, I should have be more professional. I agree. I apologize for the
tone of my post.

But you have to see my point. The so called Member Organizations are
mostly companies interested in hooking DRM to the web. So it is
logical that the majority of them agree about getting DRM into HTML5
standard. The conclussion is that we will have EME in html5 (should we
like it or not).

I can barely stand that situation... but I am just an individual with
no influence. So what should I do? Is there anything I can do to stop
EME?

Thank you for the reply
----------------------------------------------


To that I add the following:

Oh, forget about it. it's OK.

I understand. But big companies are doing that already. That is
nothing new. Problem is that their platforms are indeed a pain to
maintain, let alone the money they cost. LOL Of course. If we are
talking now is because they have figured out a way to cost reduction
in DRM platforms via a W3C standard. That is the sole thing I'm
against in this concern.

OK, you wanna earn money in a legal way (not necesarily good way)
assume your own fees and pay for it. Is that simple.


--------------------------------------------------

Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best regards to all

Julio Serrano

Received on Monday, 19 August 2013 18:29:42 UTC