- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:45:21 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 03/27/2013 03:57 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> maybe this is one of those issues that do not require telco time and >> can be formally voted on the mailing list. See my mail: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Mar/0015.html >> >> the only difference between then and now is that SPARQL is actually a >> Rec already, and PROV is in PR. And we are not obliged to wait for >> the publication of the RDFa PR for this... > > Agreed, > > """ > PROPOSAL: Add the following prefixes to the RDFa Core initial context > located at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 > > rr: http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml# > sd: http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description# > prov: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# > dc11: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ > """ +1 Gregg > +1 > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals > http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 14:45:54 UTC