- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:26:50 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
+1 (Also verified that these are the definitions in <http://prefix.cc/>.) Cheers, Niklas On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:48 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> On 03/27/2013 03:57 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> maybe this is one of those issues that do not require telco time and >>> can be formally voted on the mailing list. See my mail: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Mar/0015.html >>> >>> the only difference between then and now is that SPARQL is actually a >>> Rec already, and PROV is in PR. And we are not obliged to wait for >>> the publication of the RDFa PR for this... >> >> Agreed, >> >> """ >> PROPOSAL: Add the following prefixes to the RDFa Core initial context >> located at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 >> >> rr: http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml# >> sd: http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description# >> prov: http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# >> dc11: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ >> """ > > +1 > > Gregg > >> +1 >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals >> http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 17:27:49 UTC