W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: new draft for the RDFa Primer

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:44:06 -0500
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C74A31C8-96F1-4A6D-807B-7918B4CFEDF3@greggkellogg.net>
On Jan 30, 2013, at 3:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Guys,
> I have made some editing on the Primer, and a new draft is at
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/Overview-src.html
> most of the changes were the various error reports coming in since the last publication. I have also added a new section (2.1.3) on the property copying stuff (and also a note in section 2.1.4 that tackles a similar problem but using @resource). Comments please...

There's a problem in the second example in 2.1.3: the link href's are to "#ccpattern", but the Pattern is defined with @resource="ccpattern"; you're probably confusing with the @id attribute. It should be changed to @resource="#ccpattern".

Otherwise, the section looks great, and flows well form the proceeding.

The RDF-SPARQL-QUERY reference should probably be updated to SPARQL-QUERY for SPARQL 1.1.

Interesting that there's no link to RDF-CONCEPTS; is this intentional? I suppose RDF-PRIMER does it.

> Also: Gregg or Manu: is it worth the trouble changing respec to the newest version? What does it entail for the document?

It's pretty straight-foward; it took me 10 minutes or so to update rdfa-in-html, but that was because some custom features needed to be ported over, which I've already done. I'd be happy to help you with it, if it's a problem. I think being on the latest version is a good idea.


> Thanks
> Ivan
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 02:44:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC