- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:08:00 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Guys, > > I have made some editing on the Primer, and a new draft is at > > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/Overview-src.html Great; thanks! > most of the changes were the various error reports coming in since the last publication. I have also added a new section (2.1.3) on the property copying stuff (and also a note in section 2.1.4 that tackles a similar problem but using @resource). Comments please... Some remarks on section 2.1.3: * It should be made clear that (as of RDFa 1.1) this feature is only available for HTML. Perhaps rephrasing "RDFa introduces the notion of "Property copying" to alleviate this situation." into something like "HTML+RDFa introduces the notion of "Property copying" to alleviate this situation.", will do. * Should the "at risk" warning be added until we've decided on this feature? * The @resource used to declare the pattern is missing the octothorp used in the @href:s. It should be: <div resource="#ccpattern" typeof="rdfa:Pattern"> (I'd still personally prefer to use bnode-IDs instead of frag-IDs (and thus @resource in the links) if I were to use pattern copying; mainly because the patterns are "throw-away" resources. But as long as the pattern names don't conflict with other resources, it doesn't really matter. And granted, bnode-IDs are harder to grasp.) Cheers, Niklas > Also: Gregg or Manu: is it worth the trouble changing respec to the newest version? What does it entail for the document? > > Thanks > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:08:58 UTC