- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:34:03 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 01/28/2013 12:42 AM, Stefan Schumacher wrote: > Section 3.1 ... a conforming RDFa Processor must look at the value of > the DTD. If a DTD exists, then the processing rules are: > > The RDFa processor is probably only looking at the DOCTYPE > declaration in the documment, not the DTD file itself, so this: > > ... a conforming RDFa Processor must look at the value in the DOCTYPE > declaration (of the document) might be more precise. According to > this further: 'if a DOCTYPE declaration exists ...' Fixed. > -- Section 3.1 'In Section 7.5, processing step 6, if no IRI is > provided by a resource attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or > @src), then first check to see if the element is the head or body > element. If it is, then set *the* new subject to parent object.' The > list item above has a 'the' before 'new subject', in the previous > list item, there is no 'the'. Suggstion to remove 'the' in this one > for consistency. Fixed. > -- Section 3.1 In Section 7.5: Sequence, processing step 11, if the > element is time, and the element does not have @datetime or content > attributes, the processor must act as if there is a datetime > attribute containing exactly the element text value. Better to see in > the html version, once there is @datetime in blue with @, once > datetime in red. And last three words might be: 'elements text value' > instead of 'element text value'. Fixed. Thanks for the feedback Stefan, much appreciated. :) -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 04:34:31 UTC