W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Last Call Draft is Ready

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:26:26 -0500
Message-ID: <51074F72.8020202@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 01/27/2013 06:00 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> We should normatively reference <http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/> (the 
> new version), as we should go to REC at about the same time.

I updated the reference to what you put above. The reference is
informative since all examples are non-normative.

> I think this is better than using the arrow notation, and is really 
> more correct showing appropriate preservation of spaces (and doesn't 
> require escaping embedded quotes.

I removed the escaping of embedded quotes, but left the arrow notation
in. We don't want readers to think that there are newlines injected into
the literal where none existed before.

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 04:26:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC