W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Last Call Draft is Ready

From: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:12:46 +0530
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <51060FD6.11420.50BDAC8@stefan.duckflight.de>
Just a few small things, running out of time now, checking more 
later.

Section 3.1
... a conforming RDFa Processor must look at the value of the DTD. If 
a DTD exists, then the processing rules are:

The RDFa processor is probably only looking at the DOCTYPE 
declaration in the documment, not the DTD file itself, so this:

... a conforming RDFa Processor must look at the value in the DOCTYPE 
declaration (of the document)
might be more precise. According to this further: 'if a DOCTYPE 
declaration exists ...'

-- 

Section 3.1

'In  Section 7.5, processing step 6, if no IRI is provided by a 
resource attribute (e.g., @about, @href, @resource, or @src), then 
first check to see if the element is the head or body element. If it 
is, then set *the* new subject to parent object.'

The list item above has a 'the' before 'new subject', in the previous 
list item, there is no 'the'. Suggstion to remove 'the' in this one 
for consistency.

-- 

Section 3.1
In  Section 7.5: Sequence, processing step 11, if the element is 
time, and the element does not have @datetime or content attributes, 
the processor must act as if there is a datetime attribute containing 
exactly the element text value.

Better to see in the html version, once there is @datetime in blue 
with @, once datetime in red.
And last three words might be: 'elements text value' instead of 
'element text value'.

StefanSTS


-- 
Stefan Schumacher
Kamshet, Maharashtra, India
+91 9923670737
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 05:43:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC