W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa 1.1 Last Call Draft is Ready

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:18:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnGRb+Go-vdviDNCzzifGcnuO-ap+oN61H_STzXWXKS2=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Attributes are sometimes prepended with @ and sometimes not, e.g @about and
other time just about. In RDFA-CORE,  they are all starting with @, I like
it that way too.

"the element does not have @datetime or content attributes"
@datetime is a link but the anchors it points to does not exist in the

"In Section 7.5: Sequence, step 11, immediately after sub-step 2, if the
datatype attribute is present and evaluates to
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTML. The value of the HTML
Literal is a string created by serializing to text, all nodes that are
descendants of the current element, i.e., not including the element itself,
and giving it a datatype of
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#HTMLas defined in Section
5.2: The rdf:HTML Datatype of [RDF-CONCEPTS]. "
This paragraph doesn't read well. The first sentence doesn't end well,
replacing the first . with a comma should do. It seems the second comma (in
the form pasted above) gets in the way of the reading flow, try removing it.

"In the example above, the properties from #lennon and #band are copied
into first resource"
s/into first/into the first/


Turtle is not an acronym, it should be spelt 'Turtle', not TURTLE.

"... processors that implement RDFa Property Copying must update the output
graph using the following rules:"
Nowhere does it say that RDFa PRoperty Copying is mandatory. Wasn't it
decided to be a required feature for all RDFa processors? This sentence
above make it sound that it's optional the same way Vocabulary Expansion is


On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> On 01/21/2013 01:13 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> >>> I believe the 'if' clause should also include
> >>>
> >>> ?target rdf:type rdfa:Pattern
> >>
> >> Also, when copying, I don't think the rdf:type of rdfa:Pattern
> >> should be copied; right? So I believe the "then add: ?subject
> >> ?predicate ?object" needs a condition, like "unless: ?predicate =
> >> rdf:type and ?object = rdfa:Pattern" (possibly put in a new
> >> rightmost column).
> >
> > The remove triples also has an explicit pattern for deleting the
> > rdfa:Pattern from the target, which is unnecessary.
> Ivan, Niklas, Gregg, I believe I've made the changes each of you
> requested. Please double-check to make sure it's correct:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html#implementing-property-copying
> -- manu
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
> http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 02:19:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC