- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:40:25 -0500
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hey folks, I did a sweep through the open issues that we have in the issue tracker. Here are the proposals that I think will have consensus among the group. Just capturing it all in one place to make our discussion this Thursday go a bit more smoothly: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUE-143: Prefixes too complicated http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/143 We discussed this issue and made a number of resolutions. We're awaiting feedback from Tab before sending him an official response. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUE-144: Add @itemref-like attribute http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/144 An experimental feature has been added to HTML+RDFa 1.1 called "Property Copying" which achieves what Microdata's @itemref achieves. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html PROPOSAL: Adopt the 'Property Copying' feature as described in the 2013-01-06 HTML+RDFa Editors Draft. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUE-145: @content override @value http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/145 PROPOSAL: When both @content and @value appear on the same HTML element, the value of @content MUST be used. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUE-146: HTML5+RDFa needs rule for implied @about="" on head/body http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/146 No it doesn't, we resolved this here: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-12-08#resolution_2 RESOLVED: Modify HTML+RDFa and XHTML+RDFa to modify processing steps #5 and #6 from assuming an empty @about value to assuming that new subject is set to the parent object. We messed up and included that rule in XHTML+RDFa 1.1. We should publish a PER for that spec with the rules for an empty about="" on HEAD and BODY. PROPOSAL: Close issue 146 with no change to HTML+RDFa. Remove the rules for injecting an empty about="" for XHTML+RDFa and issue a PER for that document. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ISSUE-147: Preserve markup by default http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/147 We are trying to get Sebastian on an RDFa WG telecon so that we can discuss this issue with him in more depth. However, a number of the WG members have voiced their reservations about changing this behavior in HTML+RDFa 1.1. PROPOSAL: Do not change the HTML+RDFa 1.1 rules to preserve markup by default. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 02:40:50 UTC