- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:50:27 -0700
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > > The thing is that @rel remains a valid RDFa 1.1 property (not RDFa 1.1 Lite conformant, but a conforming processor MUST process @rel). Adding a rule, specifically for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (which includes both HTML5 and XHTML5), that removes these "junk" link relations from consideration solves the problem for the typical junk link relation terms. > As specified, I fail to see how the current HTML+RDFa 1.1 document indicates any handling of documents served with the media type application/xhtml+xml. If all you have is the content-type header and the XML (XHTML) document, how exactly do you choose between XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1 ? If that was well-defined and rational to use, that would go a long way in making this easier to use. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 21:50:56 UTC