- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:30:33 -0700
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Digging more into this, the HTML+RDFa 1.1 document needs to specify something about the application/xhtml+xml media type. If it truly handles HTML5 document in XHTML syntax, it needs to say something about Content-Type headers. Also, I believe XHTML5 is an unofficial term. HTML5 documents can have XHTML syntax (serialization) but they are still HTML5 documents. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: >> >> The thing is that @rel remains a valid RDFa 1.1 property (not RDFa 1.1 Lite conformant, but a conforming processor MUST process @rel). Adding a rule, specifically for HTML+RDFa 1.1 (which includes both HTML5 and XHTML5), that removes these "junk" link relations from consideration solves the problem for the typical junk link relation terms. >> > > As specified, I fail to see how the current HTML+RDFa 1.1 document > indicates any handling of documents served with the media type > application/xhtml+xml. If all you have is the content-type header and > the XML (XHTML) document, how exactly do you choose between XHTML+RDFa > 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1 ? If that was well-defined and rational to use, > that would go a long way in making this easier to use. > > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 22:31:02 UTC