W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Atom 1.0 + RDFa 1.1

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:16:55 +0100
Message-Id: <21D81B1F-1E33-4FCE-AC38-90B6159D25C2@w3.org>
Cc: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Well, in view of the rarity of that scenario I would fine saying that this case is not handled and leaving at that!

Sigh...

I

----
Ivan Herman
web: http://www.ivan-herman.net
mobile: +31 64 1044 153

On 15 Nov 2010, at 18:12, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 17:01 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> For an RDFa-savy preprocessing is of course easy because it can find
>> an XML Literal declaration. 
> 
> A pre-processor can easily find an XMLLiteral declaration?
> 
> What about datatype="foo"? What if "foo" is defined as expanding to
> rdf:XMLLiteral in some profile somewhere?
> 
> A pre-processor would effectively need to handle all the term mapping
> stuff, including profiles, to be able to know if it's treading inside an
> XMLLiteral.
> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 17:18:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:50 UTC