- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:52:58 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- CC: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
The only place I've seen it defined, pre-wdrs, is in daml services [1], prior to version 0.7 it was isDescribedBy. [1] http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/Service.owl Phil Archer wrote: > Checking through http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/, I don't see > describedby (any capitalisation) in any section. But there is a > definition of meta. I /think/ this is the only definition of this term, > despite it having been in common use for a long time? It was partly that > fact that lead us to suggest describedby, i.e. start from a clean slate > where there was (hopefully) no a priori assumption about what it would > link to. > > Phil. > > > > On 09/11/2010 18:53, Toby Inkster wrote: >> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:43:14 -0600 >> Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com> wrote: >> >>> Note that there are a number of ARIA terms in there too. One of >>> which is describedBy (I think). >> >> ARIA has a describedby attribute, but the XHTML vocab only include's >> ARIA's roles. >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:53:54 UTC