W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: wdrs:describedby = @rel describedby. Erratum published

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:28:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD9A0C9.8090309@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Checking through http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/, I don't see 
describedby (any capitalisation) in any section. But there is a 
definition of meta. I /think/ this is the only definition of this term, 
despite it having been in common use for a long time? It was partly that 
fact that lead us to suggest describedby, i.e. start from a clean slate 
where there was (hopefully) no a priori assumption about what it would 
link to.


On 09/11/2010 18:53, Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:43:14 -0600
> Shane McCarron<shane@aptest.com>  wrote:
>> Note that there are a number of ARIA terms in there too.  One of
>> which is describedBy (I think).
> ARIA has a describedby attribute, but the XHTML vocab only include's
> ARIA's roles.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 19:28:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:50 UTC