W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Question re ISSUE-139 Resolution

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:32:40 -0400
Message-ID: <522A2DD8.7040308@gmail.com>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Fine by me.

peter

On 09/04/2013 06:53 PM, David Wood wrote:
> Hi Peter and Pat,
>
> The RDF Working Group decided today [1] to resolve ISSUE-139 [2] (More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard) by adopting David Booth's proposed language.  The exact resolution was:
> [[
> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-139 using David Booth's proposed solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Aug/0002.html. Exact wording will be considered editorial.
> ]]
>
> Since neither of you were available for that portion of the call, I thought I should ask you whether you have any concerns or issues with the proposed resolution.  I plan to make the changes in Concepts shortly if I don't hear anything negative from you.  Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139
>
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:33:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:16 UTC