Question re ISSUE-139 Resolution

Hi Peter and Pat,

The RDF Working Group decided today [1] to resolve ISSUE-139 [2] (More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard) by adopting David Booth's proposed language.  The exact resolution was:
[[
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-139 using David Booth's proposed solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Aug/0002.html. Exact wording will be considered editorial.
]]

Since neither of you were available for that portion of the call, I thought I should ask you whether you have any concerns or issues with the proposed resolution.  I plan to make the changes in Concepts shortly if I don't hear anything negative from you.  Thanks.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood


[1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3
[2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139