W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Question re ISSUE-139 Resolution

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 00:42:55 -0700
Cc: Peter Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C7BCDA0D-1C91-4794-9FAC-53DCA38ED25F@ihmc.us>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Thats all fine with me. 

Pat

On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:53 PM, David Wood wrote:

> Hi Peter and Pat,
> 
> The RDF Working Group decided today [1] to resolve ISSUE-139 [2] (More clearly warn that "generalized RDF" is non-standard) by adopting David Booth's proposed language.  The exact resolution was:
> [[
> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-139 using David Booth's proposed solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2013Aug/0002.html. Exact wording will be considered editorial.
> ]]
> 
> Since neither of you were available for that portion of the call, I thought I should ask you whether you have any concerns or issues with the proposed resolution.  I plan to make the changes in Concepts shortly if I don't hear anything negative from you.  Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
> 
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/rdf-wg/2013-09-04#resolution_3
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/139
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 07:43:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:16 UTC