- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:51:14 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 18/03/13 16:34, Gavin Carothers wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Markus Lanthaler > <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net <mailto:markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>> wrote: > > intended to be used in the wild > has a non negligible cost. Fear not - Arnaud raised the same issue from the POV of confusing number of syntaxes and the WG has discussed the matter already several times. We are where we are - N-Triples is recognized in the community already. Andy > > > N-Triples and N-Quads are already widely used in the wild. In the case > of N-Triples over clear "Don't use this!" language in the RDF Test Cases > doc. These are not "new" syntaxes. All major RDF systems already > implement them, the key at this point it is making sure everything is > interoperable and catching up with what implementations have been doing > with them. > > Cheers, > Gavin
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 17:51:46 UTC