Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Markus Lanthaler
<markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>wrote:

> intended to be used in the wild
> has a non negligible cost.
>

N-Triples and N-Quads are already widely used in the wild. In the case of
N-Triples over clear "Don't use this!" language in the RDF Test Cases doc.
These are not "new" syntaxes. All major RDF systems already implement them,
the key at this point it is making sure everything is interoperable and
catching up with what implementations have been doing with them.

Cheers,
Gavin

Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 16:34:55 UTC