W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Agenda for 23 January 2013

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:02:57 -0600
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F23A7E31-823C-446E-8048-79F29D032288@ihmc.us>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Partial regrets. I have to accompany someone to a medical appointment. I will try to call in by cell, but I wont have IRC or an open computer, so voice only. And I will probably be late. 

Regarding the semantic issue. The options we have to choose between are 

(1) leave it as it is. The 2004 semantics does not treat an ill-formed literal as an error by itself, but it is inconsistent to assert that it is a LiteralValue or that it is the range of the relevant datatype. 

(2) (with a small modification to the model theory) we can make it be that any triple containing an illformed literal is false, so that any RDF graph containing such a literal is inconsistent. 

In both cases, this only applies when we talking about the built-in datatypes, or we are restricted to D-interpretations with D containing the relevant datatype. 

The pros and cons seem to be that (1) requires least change, but (2) means that Richard does not have to explain the difference between inconsistent and ill-typed. 

We can make the semantics work either way. Some of the standard entailments will need to be explained slightly more carefully in case (2); they are still valid, but only because the antecedent is false in some cases. For example, the entailment

sss ppp "foo"^^:type .

==>

sss ppp _:xxx .

is valid in both cases, but in case (2), the conclusion might well be false, when the string "foo" is not in the lexical space of :type.

Pat

On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:39 PM, David Wood wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The agenda for Wed, 23 Jan 2013 is available at:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.01.23
> 
> Chair: David Wood
> Scribe: Richard Cyganiak
> Alternate: Sandro Hawke
> 
> This week, we will look at the remaining Semantics issue and some open issues related to clean up tasks.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 06:03:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT