W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Agenda for 23 January 2013

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:12:59 -0600
Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <57073E40-EC0C-4EBE-9E7A-FB9ECBF3C319@ihmc.us>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
In case I don't get on the call, there is a quesiton I would like to raise concerning dataset equivalence. Suppose a dataset has two named graphs with the same label, such as (sorry if I get the syntax wrong here)

{ n1: {a b c.}
n1: {d e f .} }

and the other dataset has these two graphs unioned together with the same label:

{ni: {a b c .
       d e f .}}

Are these datasets equivalent? We need to decide the answers to questions like this.

Pat


On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:39 PM, David Wood wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The agenda for Wed, 23 Jan 2013 is available at:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.01.23
> 
> Chair: David Wood
> Scribe: Richard Cyganiak
> Alternate: Sandro Hawke
> 
> This week, we will look at the remaining Semantics issue and some open issues related to clean up tasks.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 06:13:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:53 GMT