W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:22:24 +0000
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <4CCD0FBA-F5A6-4701-B018-B92A947F4C69@cyganiak.de>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
On 9 Nov 2012, at 12:01, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Since there's agreement [1]

Well, this is an Editor's Draft, and this is fresh text that hasn't been reviewed 

> that "any web document that has an RDF-bearing representation may be considered a g-box" does it not imply that a g-box is just an RDF document?

The sentence says that every RDF document is a g-box. This doesn't mean that every g-box is an RDF document. There could be other kinds of things that “contain” RDF graphs.

Better not tie the notion of a mutable RDF container quite so tightly to the notion of publishing a document, IMO.

Best,
Richard


> 
> Link
> 
> 1. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#change-over-time .
> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 12:22:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT