W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:01:17 -0500
Message-ID: <509CF08D.2040304@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 11/9/12 5:34 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/110
>
> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak
> On product: RDF Concepts
>
> The concept that we call “g-box” is extremely useful in explaining how RDF works in the real world, and I plan to use it *informatively* in the Introduction of RDF Concepts.
>
> Should the term in the text be “g-box”, or do we slap some other label on that concept?
>
> The text is here:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#change-over-time
>
>
>
>
>
Since there's agreement [1] that "any web document that has an 
RDF-bearing representation may be considered a g-box" does it not imply 
that a g-box is just an RDF document?

Link

1. 
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#change-over-time 
.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 12:01:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT