W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:28:52 -0500
Message-ID: <509CF704.70209@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 11/9/12 7:22 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 9 Nov 2012, at 12:01, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> Since there's agreement [1]
> Well, this is an Editor's Draft, and this is fresh text that hasn't been reviewed
>
>> that "any web document that has an RDF-bearing representation may be considered a g-box" does it not imply that a g-box is just an RDF document?
> The sentence says that every RDF document is a g-box. This doesn't mean that every g-box is an RDF document. There could be other kinds of things that “contain” RDF graphs.
>
> Better not tie the notion of a mutable RDF container quite so tightly to the notion of publishing a document, IMO.
>
> Best,
> Richard

What about every g-box is an RDF source?

Kingsley
>
>
>> Link
>>
>> 1. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#change-over-time .
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen	
>> Founder & CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 12:29:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:52 GMT