Re: Sloppy inference rules

• From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
• Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:20:22 +0000
• To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
• Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <B2DF83B8-EFA8-425E-9237-408F238A7D08@cyganiak.de>

On 30 Oct 2012, at 16:15, Pat Hayes wrote:
> So my question to the WG is, how disastrous would it be if the RDFS inference rules were stated in terms of a 'sloppy' version of RDF with the syntactic restrictions removed, i.e. with the following grammar for triples?
> 
> triple ::= term term term .
> term ::=  IRI | blanknode | literal

+1

Best,
Richard

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:21:01 UTC