W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: dataset semantics being connected to the state of the web

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:54:36 +0200
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <FEB9B87C-ADAC-4F81-B58F-4B7D1716D407@cyganiak.de>
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
On 8 Jun 2012, at 14:57, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> If the only interpretations are those that support <i,G> if dereferencing I produces G, then, yes, <i,G> will be a consequence of anything (and nothing).  Of course, this would mean that entailment changes whenever the web changes.

Yes. Can of worms.

> I do not believe that this is a desirable feature to put in RDF.

I agree. I was proposing it as a semantic extension, probably informative. Most certainly not part of the core semantics.

Richard
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 16:55:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:49 GMT