- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 18:54:36 +0200
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 8 Jun 2012, at 14:57, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > If the only interpretations are those that support <i,G> if dereferencing I produces G, then, yes, <i,G> will be a consequence of anything (and nothing). Of course, this would mean that entailment changes whenever the web changes. Yes. Can of worms. > I do not believe that this is a desirable feature to put in RDF. I agree. I was proposing it as a semantic extension, probably informative. Most certainly not part of the core semantics. Richard
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 16:55:06 UTC