On Oct 20, 2011, at 14:44 , Steve Harris wrote: > Probably. The infinite entailments thing is very crazy, but the rdfs:member property is reasonably useful. > > I would be more in favour of making it less crazy e.g. limiting the instances of rdfs:member to rdfs:_N properties that actually exist in the graph. Ack. That is the ter Horst semantics that a number of triple stores already implement, or the corresponding RDFS entailment version that is defined for SPARQL 1.1. Getting one of those into the RDF Semantics is, essentially, ISSUE-11, that I raised a long time ago...[1]. Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/11 > > - Steve > > On 2011-10-20, at 13:28, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> Steve, Dan >> >> Would you be ready to at least remove them from the core RDFS semanitcs, ie, the entailments? >> >> Ivan >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman >> web: http://www.ivan-herman.net >> mobile: +31 64 1044 153 >> >> On 20 Oct 2011, at 13:21, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> >>> On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >>>> I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts. >>> >>> Me neither. Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just >>> what it is, with no great mystery or confusion. >>> >>> Dan >> > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited > 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK > +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 > Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT