W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 13:21:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFNgM+Z8KXv0WZPXWqB_hbc+HN64Nxha9+ChUAn0LkMys+oAfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts.

Me neither.  Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just
what it is, with no great mystery or confusion.

Dan
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 11:22:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT