W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: proposals for Lists and Seq (ISSUE-77)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:28:59 +0200
Message-Id: <A9B449DC-33F7-43C3-AE34-51ECFA728EC6@w3.org>
Cc: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Steve, Dan

Would you be ready to at least remove them from the core RDFS semanitcs, ie, the entailments?

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
web: http://www.ivan-herman.net
mobile: +31 64 1044 153

On 20 Oct 2011, at 13:21, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> On 20 October 2011 13:13, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
>> I wouldn't be comfortable with marking Seq as "archaic" or similar unless there's a viable alternative, and I don't think List counts.
> 
> Me neither.  Nor "quaint", "twee", "retro" or "regrettable". It's just
> what it is, with no great mystery or confusion.
> 
> Dan
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 12:29:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT