W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: RDF WG minutes from 2011-05-18

From: Zhe Wu <alan.wu@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:51 -0700
Message-ID: <4DDAA1FF.9010107@oracle.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: "Schreiber, A.T." <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "<antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>" <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>, "public-rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi,

I have done a bit cleanup and here is the latest version (haven't clicked Save for Review/Approval yet).
Actions 49 and 50 are now mentioned in the text.

http://www.w3.org/2008/06/wiki_scribe/?source=http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Chatlog_2011-05-18

Thanks for all the help!

Zhe

On 5/23/2011 10:47 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> Guus,
>
> On 23 May 2011, at 15:25, Schreiber, A.T. wrote:
>> In my recollection this Is precisely what happened, thanks Antoine. Unfortunately I have poor conectivity at the moment. Could someone take the action to update the minutes?
> I updated them already, they now say [1]:
>
> RESOLVED: Resolve ISSUE-40 by adding text to RDF Concepts, per the “Updated Proposal” from http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Skolemization#Updated_Proposal with action on Peter to propose edits
>
> So all should be sorted out now. Thanks!
>
> Richard
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-18#resolution_2
>
>
>
>> Guus
>>>
>>> Le 23/05/2011 15:52, David Wood a écrit :
>>>> On May 23, 2011, at 02:05, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 23 May 2011, at 05:49, Ivan Herman wrote:
>>>>>> Indeed, that was my immediate question reading the minutes... Do we have a resolution on the skolems (pending a s/steveH/???/ change)?
>>>>> Well, there was a proposal. There was a vote that showed no opposition (except to the SteveH name which still needs to be changed, and some re-wording which Peter provided in the meantime). Guus asked me to close ISSUE-40 with a pointer to the resolution. I tried to do so, but found the resolution not recorded in the minutes.
>>>> Hmmm.  I seem to recall that Peter still had an issue with the proposal at [1] and took an action to suggest a minor change.  Does anyone else remember?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Skolemization#Updated_Proposal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Looking at the minutes again, it was scribed that the chair said that we can close ISSUE-40, which implies that there was an (unscribed) resolution. I'm going to modify the minutes now to add the resolution. If anyone recalls this differently, please speak up and we'll revert.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----
>>>>>> Ivan Herman
>>>>>> Tel:+31 641044153
>>>>>> http://www.ivan-herman.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 May 2011, at 04:08, Lee Feigenbaum<lee@thefigtrees.net>   wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was there a resolution on the proposal regarding ISSUE-40, or was that tabled for an un-minuted reason?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> Lee
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/22/2011 4:37 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>>>>>>>> Seems like Wednesday's scribe didn't find time yet to generate the minutes, so I just did it:
>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-05-18
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I recall that one more resolution was made after a vote, but it was not scribed: accept the proposal on ISSUE-40.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Antoine Zimmermann
>>> Researcher at:
>>> Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information
>>> Database Group
>>> 7 Avenue Jean Capelle
>>> 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
>>> France
>>> Tel: +33(0)4 72 43 61 74 - Fax: +33(0)4 72 43 87 13
>>> Lecturer at:
>>> Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
>>> 20 Avenue Albert Einstein
>>> 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex
>>> France
>>> antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr
>>> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
>>>
>
Received on Monday, 23 May 2011 18:06:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:43 GMT