Which WG?

Hi Richard,

Just a quick comment..

Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> HOW WOULD IT BE USED
> 
> The main motivation would be as a result format for CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE queries against SPARQL stores. So, server-side implementors would be SPARQL store vendors.

I have to say I'm getting a little confused, it appears that the two 
things you passionately want to see this WG to provide, is a turtle like 
format for dumping out RDF Datasets, and a JSON format for dumping out 
CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE sparql results.

Why here and not the SPARQL WG?

Best,

Nathan