W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Graph-State Resources

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 07:52:18 -0500
Message-ID: <20111216.075218.1638938366199112419.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <sandro@w3.org>
CC: <phayes@ihmc.us>, <richard@cyganiak.de>, <david@3roundstones.com>, <timbl@w3.org>, <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Graph-State Resources (was Re: graphs and documents Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:21:26 -0600

> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:15 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> I see your reasoning, but these are all just too long and geeky, and
>unpronounceable. How about Thing Whose state Is a Graph, or TWIG. Then
>we can talk about RDF TWIGs, which trips off the tongue easily. 
> 
> Not bad.    Keep tryin'  :-)
> 
>      - s

I rather like this.  We could also have RDF LEAFs, RDF BRANCHes and RDG
TREEs, if only we could come up with good phrases for these to shorten.

peter
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 12:53:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT