W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec

From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:09:17 -0500
Message-ID: <20111213.170917.861681744895418092.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: <richard@cyganiak.de>
CC: <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1

peter


From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Subject: Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 14 Dec
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:03:11 -0600

> On 13 Dec 2011, at 20:54, Guus Schreiber wrote:
>> The main thing we seem to be in limbo about is the GRAPHS debate. I
> suggest we devote the meeting to this theme. I have included in the
> agenda some discussion topics that came up in recent telecons, plus the
> email of Andy on TriG examples.  I suggest we also have a
> meta-discussion on what our options are for getting consensus.
> 
> I suggest a straw poll:
> 
> [[
> PROPOSAL: Close all graph model+semantics issues by accepting the RDF
> Datasets design [1] as the data model, and by adding no new semantics.
> ]]
> 
> Knowing who can't live with this minimalist approach would be a form of
> progress IMO.
> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-multigraph
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 22:10:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:46 GMT