Re: [Fwd: review of rdf:text, dated 2008-11-04]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote:

> Criticism on the structure
> ====
> - the sections 3.1 and 3.2 are not logically part of the definition of
> the data type, and so should not be included in section 3.

I don't see sections 3.1 and 3.2 anymore. Could you check if this
comment is still valid, and if it is embed it as an editor note at the
appropriate place?

-Alan

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 17:16:26 UTC