W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-text@w3.org > January to March 2009

[Fwd: review of rdf:text, dated 2008-11-04]

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:17:18 +0100
Message-ID: <49CB8E6E.1090601@inf.unibz.it>
To: public-rdf-text@w3.org
Below are my review comments from November [1] to which I have not
received a satisfactory response and/or that have not been implemented
in the document.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-text/2008OctDec/0006.html

Criticism on the structure
- the sections 3.1 and 3.2 are not logically part of the definition of
the data type, and so should not be included in section 3.

Error in the document
- In the example in section 3.2 it is claimed that the string "Padre de
familia" is mapped to the same value as the text "Padre de familia@".
This is clearly not true.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 14:18:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:42 UTC