Re: [Fwd: review of rdf:text, dated 2008-11-04]

Both my comments have been addressed by Boris earlier today.


Best, Jos

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
> 
>> Criticism on the structure
>> ====
>> - the sections 3.1 and 3.2 are not logically part of the definition of
>> the data type, and so should not be included in section 3.
> 
> I don't see sections 3.1 and 3.2 anymore. Could you check if this
> comment is still valid, and if it is embed it as an editor note at the
> appropriate place?
> 
> -Alan

-- 
+43 1 58801 18470        debruijn@inf.unibz.it

Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
Many would be cowards if they had courage
enough.
  - Thomas Fuller

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 17:17:19 UTC