W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-ruby@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Status Check

From: David Richards <davidlamontrichards@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:33:25 -0600
Message-ID: <da25315e0908060633x5545d68cn9bd23b83ab430a34@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdf-ruby@w3.org
Sounds good to me.  I'd like to participate.

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Dimitris Dimitriadis <
dimitris@ontologicon.com> wrote:

> +1, sounds very interesting. When do you think this could be done?
>
> /Dimitris
>
>
> On 6 Aug 2009, at 15:44, Tom Morris wrote:
>
>  On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 04:06, David
>> Richards<davidlamontrichards@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed that the Ruby gems dealing with RDF seem to be roughly in
>>> the
>>> same shape as they were in February 2008.  I'm wondering if this group is
>>> active, if there are any projects under active development, or if people
>>> are
>>> using JRuby and Java-based RDF tools.
>>>
>>>
>> I'm currently in the violent throws of academic deadlines. Come next
>> month, I'll be able to work on Reddy totally guilt-free. Hopefully
>> I'll be able to make it suck a lot less, to the point where it is
>> actually useful. Ideally, we'd have One True Way of doing RDF in Ruby,
>> and it could abstract both Redland (on C Ruby), Jena (on JRuby),
>> something I don't know about yet (on IronRuby) and my hastily
>> sellotaped together parsers written in Ruby.
>>
>> I'm thinking of having a "hack Reddy" day, where the intersection of
>> people (a) interested in RDF, (b) interested in Ruby and (c) within
>> easy reach of London could get together for one day and make this
>> stuff all work. (c) is optional, of course - if it were to happen,
>> we'd be checking our commits in and hanging out on IRC, so non-UK
>> people could participate.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> --
>> Tom Morris
>> http://tommorris.org/
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 13:34:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 August 2009 13:34:03 GMT