W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-ruby@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Status Check

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:54:23 +0300
Message-Id: <E7BA48A7-9757-4084-AED2-5FD357CC3ED3@ontologicon.com>
Cc: public-rdf-ruby@w3.org
To: Tom Morris <tom@tommorris.org>
+1, sounds very interesting. When do you think this could be done?

/Dimitris

On 6 Aug 2009, at 15:44, Tom Morris wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 04:06, David
> Richards<davidlamontrichards@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've noticed that the Ruby gems dealing with RDF seem to be  
>> roughly in the
>> same shape as they were in February 2008.  I'm wondering if this  
>> group is
>> active, if there are any projects under active development, or if  
>> people are
>> using JRuby and Java-based RDF tools.
>>
>
> I'm currently in the violent throws of academic deadlines. Come next
> month, I'll be able to work on Reddy totally guilt-free. Hopefully
> I'll be able to make it suck a lot less, to the point where it is
> actually useful. Ideally, we'd have One True Way of doing RDF in Ruby,
> and it could abstract both Redland (on C Ruby), Jena (on JRuby),
> something I don't know about yet (on IronRuby) and my hastily
> sellotaped together parsers written in Ruby.
>
> I'm thinking of having a "hack Reddy" day, where the intersection of
> people (a) interested in RDF, (b) interested in Ruby and (c) within
> easy reach of London could get together for one day and make this
> stuff all work. (c) is optional, of course - if it were to happen,
> we'd be checking our commits in and hanging out on IRC, so non-UK
> people could participate.
>
> Yours,
>
> -- 
> Tom Morris
> http://tommorris.org/
>
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 12:55:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 6 August 2009 12:55:32 GMT