W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2008

Re: RDFa XSLT [was: telecon today + RDFa Implementation Report update]

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:58:10 -0500
Message-ID: <489B0D82.80808@aptest.com>
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
CC: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

And yes - you should ignore @xml:base ALWAYS in XHTML+RDFa.

Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> At 03:43 PM 8/7/2008 +0200, Fabien Gandon wrote:
>> - test 109 : I fail, I could start adding tests to check those cases but I am not sure how far I should go and I wonder if validating the XHTML is not outside the scope of an XSLT transformation for RDFa. Does that test mean I should always ignore the “@xml:base” for RDFa?
> The point of test 109 is not to discover whether an implementation
> notices that the document does not validate against the DTD/XHTML
> schema but rather to confirm that @xml:base is ignored (and thus
> the subject of the triple in the test is the document and not the
> value of the @xml:base attribute) in an XHTML1 document if the
> XHTML RDFa processor proceeds in spite of the validation failure.
> Validating is outside the scope of these tests.  The comment in
> the test case is to note that we are aware that this test intentionally
> does not validate.

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:58:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:29 UTC