- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 10:52:05 -0400
- To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
At 03:43 PM 8/7/2008 +0200, Fabien Gandon wrote: >- test 109 : I fail, I could start adding tests to check those cases but I am not sure how far I should go and I wonder if validating the XHTML is not outside the scope of an XSLT transformation for RDFa. Does that test mean I should always ignore the “@xml:base” for RDFa? The point of test 109 is not to discover whether an implementation notices that the document does not validate against the DTD/XHTML schema but rather to confirm that @xml:base is ignored (and thus the subject of the triple in the test is the document and not the value of the @xml:base attribute) in an XHTML1 document if the XHTML RDFa processor proceeds in spite of the validation failure. Validating is outside the scope of these tests. The comment in the test case is to note that we are aware that this test intentionally does not validate.
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:53:01 UTC