Re: Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (ISSUE-25)

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Elias Torres wrote:
>> [...] On our RDFa TF call, we discussed with Mark
>> the XMLLiteral issue
> 
> Is that issue 25?
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/25

Yes.

> 
> It would be nice to have some convention for subject
> lines that are relevant to issues... though I
> prefer content-bearing words ("XMLLiteral issue")
> to issue numbers.

Right.

> 
> I encourage the use of both some content-bearing
> words and the issue number.

I didn't even know the feature existed.

> 
> Oh... the tracker docs say
>   If you're mentioning a particular issue simply use the issue
> identifier, such as “ISSUE-123”. The word ISSUE must be in uppercase.
>   -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email

I'll do from now on.

> 
> though I think the SWD tracker is only watching
> the public-swd-wg list, not this one. Oh well.
> 

I guess somebody should fix that.

Thanks

-Elias