W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Possible solution to XMLLiteral issue (ISSUE-25)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:51:07 -0500
To: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-Id: <1174319467.5216.66.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 10:53 -0400, Elias Torres wrote:
> [...] On our RDFa TF call, we discussed with Mark
> the XMLLiteral issue

Is that issue 25?

It would be nice to have some convention for subject
lines that are relevant to issues... though I
prefer content-bearing words ("XMLLiteral issue")
to issue numbers.

I encourage the use of both some content-bearing
words and the issue number.

Oh... the tracker docs say
  If you're mentioning a particular issue simply use the issue
identifier, such as ´ISSUE-123¡. The word ISSUE must be in uppercase.
  -- http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/email

though I think the SWD tracker is only watching
the public-swd-wg list, not this one. Oh well.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 15:51:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC