- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:12:43 -0700
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Ben, > > I'm +1 on the functionality, but I'm not keen on saying "behaves just > like", since it might lead to confusion. I suppose if this is text > just for the resolution and not the spec, it's not too bad. Is that > what you're thinking? Yes, I suspect the spec will have to be a bit more formal, indeed. That said, I realized that, in my haste I didn't completely cover this issue. Now that it looks like we have instanceof as the current leader in the pool, what happens with: <img about="s" rel="p" src="o" instanceof="t" /> I think we agreed last time (though Ralph was looking into this more deeply), that this would result in: s p o . o rdf:type t . I think that's what it should be. Now, what happens if we say: <a about="s" rel="p" href="o" instanceof="t"> foo </a> I think the same thing should happen, meaning instanceof applies to the @href when it's present. *But*, that's a different discussion, so let me make this issue resolution clearer. So, PROPOSED RESOLUTION: " The @src attributes on IMG behaves as follows: - the object of @rel on IMG is @src - if @instanceof is present, the rdf:type applies to @src - subject resolution is normal. " -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 15:12:43 UTC