Re: Missing Use case? [Re: an update of the use case document]

Ivan,

> X wants to publish a large(er) vocabulary in RDFS and/or OWL. X also
> wants to provide a clear, human readable description of the same
> vocabulary. Using RDFa, the terms themselves can be mixed with a
> descriptive text in HTML. The RDFa engine can then extract the
> vocabulary in RDF/XML and/or n3 formats, to be included used directly by
> RDF aware applications (eg, reasoners).

Great, I was waiting to hear more from the SKOS folks about this before
proceeding :) I'm glad that this is still interesting, and I do think we
should include it as a use case. I'm adding it now as a barebones use
case, and I hope Alistair or someone else can help expand it!

-Ben